linux-kernel - Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080222221014.GB9510@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:10:14 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc:	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	Alexey Zaytsev <zaytsev.a@...tei.ru>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: bcm43xx regression in 2.6.24 (with patch)

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:56:14PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008 18:51:32 Gabriel C wrote:
> > > I'm not going to play these kconfig SELECT tricks anymore.
> > 
> > Fix it different then.
> 
> Please do so.
> 
> > Yes it is but that is still not a valid reason to NACK that patch , I'm sorry.
> 
> NACK means I (being the maintainer of the modified code) won't
> sign-off this patch. Nothing more or less. If some upstream maintainer
> decides to bypass me and apply the patch nevertheless is not of
> my business. But I will not sign-off or ack this patch.

As the maintainer will not accept this, I'm not going to take it for the
-stable tree either, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/