linux-kernel - Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:28:58 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Glenn Streiff <gstreiff@...Effect.com>,
	Faisal Latif <flatif@...Effect.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers

Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes:

> IMO the line length overruns make good warnings.  Not as in "here's a cheap
> way to get more changesets", but as in "that code might have other problems
> nearby" kind of heuristics.

Sure, it does. However the human looking at the code is far better at
spotting such problems. Machine-generated warnings are great when the
machine is actually better than human.

Anyway, warnings are one thing and line limit is another. We may raise
the limit leaving the 80-chars warning in place. Unless there are too
many false positives, of course.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/