[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m38x1c4od1.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:28:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Glenn Streiff <gstreiff@...Effect.com>,
Faisal Latif <flatif@...Effect.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> IMO the line length overruns make good warnings. Not as in "here's a cheap
> way to get more changesets", but as in "that code might have other problems
> nearby" kind of heuristics.
Sure, it does. However the human looking at the code is far better at
spotting such problems. Machine-generated warnings are great when the
machine is actually better than human.
Anyway, warnings are one thing and line limit is another. We may raise
the limit leaving the 80-chars warning in place. Unless there are too
many false positives, of course.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists