[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080222234216.GA25809@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:42:16 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sam@...nborg.org, arjan@...radead.org, gregkh@...e.de,
stable@...nel.org, stable-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] patch
kbuild-allow-fstack-protector-to-take-effect.patch added to
2.6.24-stable tree
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:34:07PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:18:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:06:04PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:00:58PM -0800, gregkh@...e.de wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
> > > >
> > > > Subject: kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
> > > >
> > > > to the 2.6.24-stable tree. Its filename is
> > > >
> > > > kbuild-allow-fstack-protector-to-take-effect.patch
> > > >
> > > > A git repo of this tree can be found at
> > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> > >
> > > Is this wise given this thread.. http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/22/101 ?
> > >
> > > At least until the problem is understood, not enabling this seems like
> > > a better option for -stable
> >
> > I thought that thread was for the much larger patches, not just this
> > Makefile change.
>
> At the least we'll likely want to also pick up the other stack protector fixes
> that went into .25rc if we turn it on in .24
Hm, that sounds like a new feature :)
I thought the makefile change was just a bugfix in the broken makefile.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists