[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080223.165944.37229792.xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:59:44 +0800 (CST)
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: adobriyan@...il.com
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] (Resend) Use get_personality()
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] (Resend) Use get_personality()
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:51:01 +0300
Message-ID: <20080223085101.GC2262@...tell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:14:03PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> > This patchset makes the macro get_personality function alike
> > and teaches code to use get_personality() instead of explicit
> > reference.
> >
> > [I am sorry if you've received multiple copied of this, since
> > my git-send-email doesn't work well. ]
>
> Yes, but why? "current->personality" is way more understandable than
> your macro because task subject to dereference is very visible.
Use get_personality() can hide the task_struct internals a bit.
And I don't think using the macro to access it is less understandable.
Since 'current' won't be NULL, whether the dereference is visible is
not important.
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists