[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080223133854.GQ27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:38:54 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: haveblue@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de,
akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/30] r/o bind mounts: drop write during emergency remount
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:29:15PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > file_list_lock();
> > list_for_each_entry(f, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_list) {
> > - if (S_ISREG(f->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode) && file_count(f))
> > - f->f_mode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
> > + struct vfsmount *mnt;
> > + if (!S_ISREG(f->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
> > + continue;
> > + if (!file_count(f))
> > + continue;
> > + if (!(f->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> > + continue;
> > + f->f_mode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
> > + mnt = f->f_path.mnt;
>
> AFAICS an mntget() is needed here to make sure mnt doesn't go away
> after releasing file_list_lock.
Good catch, but... that's not all. We also have to move
drop_file_write_access() in __fput() past the file_kill(), or we'll
get a race here - CPU 1 enters that loop, sees ->f_count 1, checks
that file is writable, CPU 2 does final fput() and proceeds to
do drop_file_write_access() and mnt_drop_write(). CPU 1, in the
meanwhile, removes FMODE_WRITE and goes on to do mnt_drop_write()
itself.
Oh, well... Fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists