[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080223105933.e6884808.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:59:33 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@...nvz.org, balbir@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ResCounter: Use read_uint in memory controller
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:33:34 -0800 "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Looks good, except for the name uint(), can we make it u64(). Integers are 32
> > bit on both ILP32 and LP64, but we really read/write 64 bit values.
>
> Yes, that's true. But read_uint() is more consistent with all the
> other instances in cgroups and subsystems. So if we were to call it
> res_counter_read_u64() I'd also want to rename all the other
> *read_uint functions/fields to *read_u64 too. Can I do that in a
> separate patch?
>
Sounds sensible to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists