lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:34:14 +0100
From:	Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@...mplin-utc.net>
To:	len.brown@...el.com
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, dsdt@...gusch.at,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	trenn@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH] Use userland-like functions for reading the ACPI table

21/02/08 19:46, Éric Piel wrote/a écrit:
> In the mean time, here is a patch which should get the situation already
> much cleaner. It has been tested on various configs (with and without
> DSDT). Let me know if you think it is acceptable.
> 
It seems the patch looks ok for people around so here is a s-o-b version 
for Len. It's against 2.6.25-rc2.

Eric

--

As recommended by Christoph Hellwig, even if we can't rely on the userspace
firmware loader so early at boot, at least use normal syscall (as in
init/do_mounts_*.c). Similarly, use kfree() instead of ACPI_FREE().

Also, it's recommended to open the file before stating it, to avoid surprises.

Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
---
 drivers/acpi/osl.c |   33 +++++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 34b3386..b836305 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
 #include <acpi/processor.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 
 #include <linux/efi.h>
 #include <linux/ioport.h>
@@ -327,8 +328,7 @@ acpi_os_predefined_override(const struct acpi_predefined_names *init_val,
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_INITRD
 static struct acpi_table_header *acpi_find_dsdt_initrd(void)
 {
-	struct file *firmware_file;
-	mm_segment_t oldfs;
+	int fd;
 	unsigned long len, len2;
 	struct acpi_table_header *dsdt_buffer, *ret = NULL;
 	struct kstat stat;
@@ -342,20 +342,21 @@ struct acpi_table_header *acpi_find_dsdt_initrd(void)
 	 * But this code must be run before there is any userspace available.
 	 * A static/init firmware infrastructure doesn't exist yet...
 	 */
-	if (vfs_stat(ramfs_dsdt_name, &stat) < 0)
-		return ret;
+	fd = sys_open(ramfs_dsdt_name, O_RDONLY, 0);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return ret; /* No need for warning, no DSDT override is normal */
+
+	/* There exists 3 different sys_fstat's, all are wrapper to vfs_fstat */
+	if (vfs_fstat(fd, &stat) < 0) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Failed to stat %s.\n", ramfs_dsdt_name);
+		goto err;
+	}
 
 	len = stat.size;
 	/* check especially against empty files */
 	if (len <= 4) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Failed: DSDT only %lu bytes.\n", len);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	firmware_file = filp_open(ramfs_dsdt_name, O_RDONLY, 0);
-	if (IS_ERR(firmware_file)) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Failed to open %s.\n", ramfs_dsdt_name);
-		return ret;
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	dsdt_buffer = kmalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
@@ -364,15 +365,11 @@ struct acpi_table_header *acpi_find_dsdt_initrd(void)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	oldfs = get_fs();
-	set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
-	len2 = vfs_read(firmware_file, (char __user *)dsdt_buffer, len,
-		&firmware_file->f_pos);
-	set_fs(oldfs);
+	len2 = sys_read(fd, (char __user *)dsdt_buffer, len);
 	if (len2 < len) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Failed to read %lu bytes from %s.\n",
 			len, ramfs_dsdt_name);
-		ACPI_FREE(dsdt_buffer);
+		kfree(dsdt_buffer);
 		goto err;
 	}
 
@@ -380,7 +377,7 @@ struct acpi_table_header *acpi_find_dsdt_initrd(void)
 			len, ramfs_dsdt_name);
 	ret = dsdt_buffer;
 err:
-	filp_close(firmware_file, NULL);
+	sys_close(fd);
 	return ret;
 }
 #endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ