[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C08134.2030205@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:25:24 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi fixes for 2.6.25-rc2
James Bottomley wrote:
> This is the latest crop of bug fixes plus one new driver: mvsas. We're
[...]
> Jeff Garzik (1):
> mvsas: Add Marvell 6440 SAS/SATA driver
[...]
> Ke Wei (1):
> mvsas: convert from rough draft to working driver
I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the
original author of mvsas, but...
Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
On one hand, it's clear the addition does not break anything, and adds
value for users.
On the other hand, it's clearly not a bug fix, and -rc could easily get
bloated with new drivers that didn't make the merge window.
On the net driver side of things, I have a few new net drivers that I
have queued for 2.6.26, because they did not make the merge window.
This is inconsistent with your apparently policy.
I would just prefer to have a clear and consistent policy here,
regarding new drivers during -rc.
Thanks,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists