| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080223020913.GL27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:09:13 +0000 From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com> Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>, Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, git@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question about your git habits On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:51:04PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes: > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 02:37:00AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > >> >do you tend to clone the entire repository repeatedly into a series > >> >of separate working directories > >> > >> Too time consuming on consumer drives with projects the size of Linux. > > > > git clone -l -s > > > > is not particulary slow... > > How big is a checkout of a single revision of kernel these days, > compared to a well-packed history since v2.6.12-rc2? > > The cost of writing out the work tree files isn't ignorable and > probably more than writing out the repository data (which -s > saves for you). Depends... I'm using ext2 for that and noatime everywhere, so that might change the picture, but IME it's fast enough... As for the size, it gets to ~320Mb on disk, which is comparable to the pack size (~240-odd Mb). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists