linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] x86: Use ELF section to list CPU vendor specific code (Linux Tiny)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:19:34 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Linux-tiny@...enic.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] x86: Use ELF section to list CPU vendor specific
 code (Linux Tiny)

Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> This is not quite what Peter and I were thinking of, I think. It's not
> at all generic. How about a section that simply contains a set of
> function pointers, a macro to add things to that section, and a function
> that calls all the pointers in that section. Eg:
> 
> CALLBACK_SECTION(init_cpu_amd, "cpuvendor.init");
> invoke_callback_section("cpuvendor.init");
> 
> ..which would give us a generic facility we could use in various places.
> 

Indeed, we already have enough instances of this kind of stuff.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/