[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87oda6p9st.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:02:26 +0000
From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To: Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.24.2: 4KSTACKS + pcdrw + dm + mount -> stack overflow: ide-cd related? dm-related?
On 24 Feb 2008, Peter Osterlund told this:
> Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk> writes:
>> But while I'd normally blame pktcdvd there's only one pktcdvd function
>> in these tracebacks (pkt_open) and it's not got a significant stack
>> footprint.
>
> Did you verify that with "make checkstack" or just by looking at the
> source code? On my system, pkt_open() consumes 584 bytes because the
> compiler decides to inline lots of functions that would not normally
> be part of long call chains. The following patch fixes that problem on
> my system.
I just looked at the source; I forgot `make checkstack' existed.
On this system:
0xc0263e0f pkt_open [vmlinux]: 556
which is nearly as bad.
(As an aside, I'm surprised I didn't oops when packet-writing as well:
0xc021270d udf_process_sequence [vmlinux]: 692
0xc020f43d udf_add_entry [vmlinux]: 628
owch. I guess that's called via a shorter call chain...)
I'll try the patch after this series of backups is done :)
--
`The rest is a tale of post and counter-post.' --- Ian Rawlings
describes USENET
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists