[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080224190207.GA18908@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:02:07 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: jffs2: -ENOSPC when truncating file?!
On Sun 2008-02-24 18:57:32, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 07:57 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > Could a na??ve implementation of this get exploited by doing a large
> > number of truncates that just shave single bytes off various files?
>
> Yeah, which is why _my_ na??ve implementation would do it for
> truncate-to-zero instead of just _any_ truncate (which could even be
> truncate-to-larger).
>
> A more complex version might allow _any_ transaction to eat into the
> ALLOC_DELETION pool if it is ultimately going to reduce the amount of
> space taken on the file system -- even overwriting 'real' data with
> zeroes which compress better. That's going to be hard to calculate in
> the general case though.
>
> If allowing only truncate-to-zero isn't good enough, perhaps we could
> allow truncation to use the ALLOC_DELETION pool when it's going to
> obsolete at least one full data node. That's not so hard to check.
I believe truncate-to-zero is good enough.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists