[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200802242109.48573.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:09:47 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
Cc: "Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Pierre Ossman" <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
"Kernel development list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pm list" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted
On Sunday, 24 of February 2008, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2008/2/24, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>:
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > You know, with this new patch we probably don't need
> > > > device_pm_schedule_removal() any more.
> > >
> > > No, we don't. However, because of that dpm_suspend() and device_power_down()
> > > need to be changed not to assume that the removed devices will end up on
> > > dpm_destroy.
> >
> >
> > with analogous changes to dpm_suspend().
> >
> > Any more suggestions for updates?
> >
>
> Is there any current patch I should actually test - it looks there is
> ongoing discussion from the time Rafael has proposed his last patch to
> check by me: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14961&action=view
>
> But I think it's visible the only suspend update will not resolve my
> problems and the problems is deeper in the mmc.
Yes, there are problems in there, but your feedback is needed nevertheless.
> So should I still test yesterdays' patch ?
Yes please. It will be valuable information to us whether it fixes the suspend
issue at least.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists