linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make v9fs uname and remotename parsing more robust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080224141733.91bd6a26.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:17:33 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc:	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@...kov.net>,
	"Jim Meyering" <meyering@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make v9fs uname and remotename parsing more robust

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:37:23 -0600 "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >  It would be better to present this as two patches.  One adds the new core
> >  APIs and the other uses those APIs in v9fs.  The patches would take
> >  separate routes into mainline.
> >
> >  I guess I can sneak this one in as-is, as long as the v9fs guys are OK with
> >  that?
> >
> 
> I'm fine with it.  Shall I pull it through the v9fs-devel patch line
> or would you rather send it with your patches Andrew?
> 

It's more likely to get some testing in your tree, thanks.  I'll send over
my version with improved title and my s-o-b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/