[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <200802241500.52860.yinghai.lu@sun.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:00:52 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kiran@...lemp.com, shai@...lemp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: make amd quad core 8 socket system not be
clustered_box v2
On Sunday 24 February 2008 04:29:03 am Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:48:42PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > quad core 8 socket system will have apic id lifting.the apic id range could
> > be [4, 0x23]. and apic_is_clustered_box will think that need to three clusters
> > and that is large than 2. So it is treated as clustered_box.
>
> Ok I see you chose the quick hack over doing it properly ...
>
> >
> > and will get
> >
> > Marking TSC unstable due to TSCs unsynchronized
> >
> > even the CPUs have X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC set.
>
> I doubt that will do the right thing on AMD based vSMP,
> which also required the cluster check on AMD iirc.
>
> Cc'ed Kiran/Shai. damage has already hit x86 tree I believe.
do you have bootlog for these box?
IBM summit2, Unisys es70000, and system from scalemp..
DMI could tell the difference?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists