linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] x86,fpu: split FPU state from task struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080224072202.GB655@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:22:02 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86,fpu: split FPU state from task struct


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> Split the FPU save area from the task struct. This allows easy 
> migration of FPU context, and it's generally cleaner. It also allows 
> the following two optimizations:
> 
> 1) only allocate when the application actually uses FPU, so in the 
> first lazy FPU trap. This could save memory for non-fpu using apps. 
> Next patch does this lazy allocation.
> 
> 2) allocate the right size for the actual cpu rather than 512 bytes 
> always. Patches enabling xsave/xrstor support (coming shortly) will 
> take advantage of this.

i like the concept. Please clean up the issues found by Christoph and 
please also base it against x86.git#testing [this is clear 2.6.26 
material and there are already some changes in this area]:

   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/