[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080224115722.62989d5c@paolo-desktop>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:57:22 +0100
From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
To: hpa <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Coding Style fixes to arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
File is now error free.
Compile tested.
Patch is against x86#testing
Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
index 7f9c6da..7dc5d5c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu_32.c
@@ -27,17 +27,17 @@ static void __save_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
/*
* descriptor tables
*/
- store_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
- store_idt(&ctxt->idt);
- store_tr(ctxt->tr);
+ store_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
+ store_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+ store_tr(ctxt->tr);
/*
* segment registers
*/
- savesegment(es, ctxt->es);
- savesegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
- savesegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
- savesegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
+ savesegment(es, ctxt->es);
+ savesegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
+ savesegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
+ savesegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
/*
* control registers
@@ -48,10 +48,12 @@ static void __save_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
ctxt->cr4 = read_cr4();
}
+/* Needed by apm.c */
void save_processor_state(void)
{
__save_processor_state(&saved_context);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_processor_state);
static void do_fpu_end(void)
{
@@ -64,9 +66,14 @@ static void do_fpu_end(void)
static void fix_processor_context(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- struct tss_struct * t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
+ struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu);
- set_tss_desc(cpu,t); /* This just modifies memory; should not be necessary. But... This is necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some similar stupidity. */
+ set_tss_desc(cpu, t); /*
+ * This just modifies memory; should not be
+ * necessary. But... This is necessary, because
+ * 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
+ * similar stupidity.
+ */
load_TR_desc(); /* This does ltr */
load_LDT(¤t->active_mm->context); /* This does lldt */
@@ -100,16 +107,16 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
* now restore the descriptor tables to their proper values
* ltr is done i fix_processor_context().
*/
- load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
- load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
+ load_gdt(&ctxt->gdt);
+ load_idt(&ctxt->idt);
/*
* segment registers
*/
- loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
- loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
- loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
- loadsegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
+ loadsegment(es, ctxt->es);
+ loadsegment(fs, ctxt->fs);
+ loadsegment(gs, ctxt->gs);
+ loadsegment(ss, ctxt->ss);
/*
* sysenter MSRs
@@ -123,11 +130,9 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
mcheck_init(&boot_cpu_data);
}
+/* Needed by apm.c */
void restore_processor_state(void)
{
__restore_processor_state(&saved_context);
}
-
-/* Needed by apm.c */
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_processor_state);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(restore_processor_state);
--
1.5.4.2.316.gf7a7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists