[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080225001816.GA2933@ubuntu>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:18:16 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lguest@...abs.org,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG + PATCH/Bugfix] x86/lguest: fix pgdir pmd index
calculation
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:26:53PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:18:14PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > I've picked up your patch into x86.git#testing (until Rusty picks it
> > up), you can track it the following way:
> >
> > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README
> >
> > it has other lguest fixes as well - could you double-check that
> > x86.git#testing works fine for you as-is? (i've just updated the git
> > tree so it includes your fix as well)
> >
>
> Ofcourse. I'll send you the results by GMT night.
>
This thread's main bug no longer appears. There's a new bug though,
but it looks nicer than the original ugly bug!.
The new bug does *not* appear in mainline with the same patch. It's
a panic, but this time on the _guest_ side (which is the same host's
kernel).
[ 0.023996] CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1500MHz stepping 05
[ 0.023996] Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel compiled for Pentium+, requires TSC feature!
[ 0.023996] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25-rc2-00815-g3db3a05 #64
[ 0.024996] [<c011bbc7>] panic+0x47/0x120
[ 0.024996] [<c0101b30>] lguest_power_off+0x0/0x20
[ 0.024996] [<c02a88c5>] check_bugs+0x155/0x170
[ 0.024996] [<c02a2b1f>] start_kernel+0x22f/0x2d0
[ 0.024996] [<c02a2390>] unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x1f0
[ 0.024996] [<c0101450>] lguest_restart+0x0/0x20
[ 0.024996] [<c0101450>] lguest_restart+0x0/0x20
[ 0.024996] [<c02a5e22>] lguest_init+0x282/0x290
[ 0.024996] =======================
I'll track it further in my first free time slot.
It seems lguest is very sensitive to x86 tree changes. Could it be
included in a sort of automatic guest-boot testing, please ?
Thank you,
--
"Better to light a candle, than curse the darkness"
Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists