[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C21284.7040607@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:57:40 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc2-git8 fails to boot on 486 due to TSC breakage
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>
> Here's how the breakage occurs:
> 1. arch/x86/kernel/tsc_32.c:tsc_init() sees !cpu_has_tsc,
> so bails and calls setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC).
> 2. include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h:setup_clear_cpu_cap(bit) clears
> the bit in boot_cpu_data and sets it in cleared_cpu_caps
> 3. arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:identify_cpu() XORs all caps
> in with cleared_cpu_caps
> HOWEVER, at this point c->x86_capability correctly has TSC
> Off, cleared_cpu_caps has TSC On, so the XOR incorrectly
> sets TSC to On in c->x86_capability, with disastrous results.
>
> The real bug is that clearing bits with XOR only works if the
> bits are known to be 1 prior to the XOR, and that's not true here.
>
> A simple fix is to convert the XOR to AND-NOT instead. The following
> patch does that, and allows my 486 to boot 2.6.25-rc kernels again.
>
Please fix it in both places. Using XOR instead of AND-NOT is a bug,
plain and simple.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists