[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080225215454.GF2659@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:54:54 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bill.huey@...il.com,
kevin@...man.org, cminyard@...sta.com, dsingleton@...sta.com,
dwalker@...sta.com, npiggin@...e.de, dsaxena@...xity.net,
ak@...e.de, acme@...hat.com, gregkh@...e.de, sdietrich@...ell.com,
pmorreale@...ell.com, mkohari@...ell.com
Subject: Re: [(RT RFC) PATCH v2 3/9] rearrange rt_spin_lock sleep
Hi!
> @@ -720,7 +728,8 @@ rt_spin_lock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
> * saved_state accordingly. If we did not get a real wakeup
> * then we return with the saved state.
> */
> - saved_state = xchg(¤t->state, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + saved_state = current->state;
> + smp_mb();
>
> for (;;) {
> unsigned long saved_flags;
Please document what the barrier is good for.
Plus, you are replacing atomic operation with nonatomic; is that ok?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists