linux-kernel - Re: [patch 06/38] quota: turn quotas off when remounting read-only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080225215749.GC25449@duck.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:57:49 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 06/38] quota: turn quotas off when remounting read-only

On Fri 22-02-08 16:29:51, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.24-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us
> know.
  Hmm, this patch is certainly safe from a kernel POV but changes a
behavior WRT userspace. Previously, user could do:
  quotaon /
  mount -o remount,ro /
  <be lucky>
  mount -o remount,rw /
  <have quotas still turned on>

  But with the patch, the quotas will be turned off. So I'm not sure
whether it's acceptable as a -stable thing...

								Honza
> 
> ------------------
>  
> 
> From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> 
> patch 66191dc622f5ff0a541524c4e96fdacfacfda206 in mainline.
> 
> Turn off quotas before filesystem is remounted read only.  Otherwise quota
> will try to write to read-only filesystem which does no good...  We could
> also just refuse to remount ro when quota is enabled but turning quota off
> is consistent with what we do on umount.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> 
> ---
>  fs/super.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb
>  			mark_files_ro(sb);
>  		else if (!fs_may_remount_ro(sb))
>  			return -EBUSY;
> +		DQUOT_OFF(sb);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (sb->s_op->remount_fs) {
> 
> -- 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/