linux-kernel - Re: [xfs-masters] filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected, powerpc related?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47C353D4.1060501@sandeen.net>
Date:	Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:48:36 -0800
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	xfs-masters@....sgi.com, xfs@....sgi.com,
	johannes@...solutions.net,
	linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected,
 powerpc related?)

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 25 of February 2008, Eric Sandeen wrote:


>> If you're feeling motivated, maybe you can narrow it down to which of
>> the changes - xfs_highbit32, xfs_highbit64, xfs_lowbit32, or
>> xfs_lowbit64 - is causing the problem?  (or maybe they all are ...)
>>
>> Or maybe someone looking at the commit can immediately see the
>> problem... but I can't :)
> 
> Well, IMO a reproducible filesystem corruption is a serious enough issue
> for reverting all of the commits in question.

I'm not suggesting a partial revert; I just wonder which part of the
change is causing the problem, as part of the debugging process.

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/