[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802252248400.9390@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:53:41 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clameter@....com,
Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] mempolicy: add MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES flag
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:
> $ grep mpol_store_user_nodemask mm/mempolicy.c
> static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol)
> if (mpol_store_user_nodemask(policy))
> if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(a))
> if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) &&
>
> So I see no need to waste the instructions needed (in the three copies
> of this code, since it's static inline) to convert a non-zero value to
> exactly the value 1.
>
Done, thanks.
> Hmmm ... speaking of static inline ... I can knock 600 bytes (that's
> IA64 bytes, so equivalent to about 300 x86 bytes) off the kernel text
> size by not inlining the mm/mempolicy.c routines check_pgd_range() and
> interleave_nid(). I wonder if that would be worth doing. Perhaps
> those two routines are in sufficiently tight corners that the duplicate
> copies of them is needed.
>
It seems like a worthwhile change to me even though gcc will pass the
actuals to check_pgd_range() on the stack. The callers to check_range()
shouldn't be in any fast paths: migrate_to_node() can take a long time
depending on the length of the page list and do_mbind() sleeps on
mmap_sem.
text data bss dec hex filename
11695 24 24 11743 2ddf mm/mempolicy.o.before
11215 24 24 11263 2bff mm/mempolicy.o.after
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists