[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080226093809.GF26611@minantech.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:38:09 +0200
From: glebn@...taire.com (Gleb Natapov)
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, steiner@....com,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Izik Eidus <izike@...ranet.com>,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@...oo.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, daniel.blueman@...drics.com,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [patch 5/6] mmu_notifier: Support for
drivers with revers maps (f.e. for XPmem)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:52:41PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 18:21, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:11:32PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > You are missing one point here. The MPI specifications that have
> > > > been out there for decades do not require the process use a library
> > > > for allocating the buffer. I realize that is a horrible shortcoming,
> > > > but that is the world we live in. Even if we could change that spec,
> > >
> > > Can you change the spec?
> >
> > Not really. It will break all existing codes.
>
> I meant as in eg. submit changes to MPI-3
MPI spec tries to be backward compatible. And MPI-2 spec is 10 years
old, but MPI-1 is still in a wider use. HPC is moving fast in terms of HW
technology, but slow in terms of SW. Fortran is still hot there :)
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists