[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C361B9.7010304@panasas.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:47:53 -0800
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
CC: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tabs, spaces, indent and 80 character lines
On Feb. 25, 2008, 13:40 -0800, Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se> wrote:
> Benny Halevy wrote:
>> On Feb. 24, 2008, 7:40 -0800, Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se> wrote:
>>
>>> Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
>>>
>>>> Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se> writes:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Why hinder a developer who prefer
>>>>> 2, 4, 6 or any other != 8 width?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I guess we could use tabs only at the line start, for indentation
>>>> only. Rather hard to implement, most text editors can't do that yet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You mean for split lines? Hopefully there won't be that many, so there
>>> is just to delete the tabs it added and replace it with spaces.
>>>
>> IMO, tabs SHOULD be used for syntactic indentation and spaces for
>> decoration purpose only. I.e. a line should start with a number of tabs
>> equal to its nesting level and after that only spaces should be used.
>> for example, the following code
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) printk("a very long format string", some, parameters);
>>
>> should be formatted like this:
>>
>> <tabs...>for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>> <tabs...><tab>printk("a very long format string",
>> <tabs...><tab> some, parameters);
>>
>> this will show exactly right regardless of your editor's tab expansion setting
>> as long as you use fixed-width fonts - where the screen width of the space character
>> is equal to all other characters. Once you start using tabs instead of spaces
>> to push text right so it appears exactly below some other text on the line above
>> you make a dependency on *your* editor's tab expansion policy and that's not very
>> considerate for folks who prefer a different one.
>>
> Don't know what to say more then: Yup! :)
>
> But the CodeStyle-document and checkpatch.pl does not agree with that.
>
I know :(
If there's enough interest I can take a stab at seeing what it'd
take to implement such a check in checkpatch.pl
Benny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists