[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080226102719.GB21257@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:27:19 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: dann frazier <dannf@...nf.org>
Cc: Glen Nakamura <glen@...dulo.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.36.1 hangs.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:13:46AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> I'm now able to reliably reproduce it by creating/removing a chroot
> (pbuilder create on a Debian system, though I'm sure a simpler test
> exists). Correcting the le16_to_cpu placement as Glen described
> fixes the issue for me.
OK that's excellent news.
> > BTW, I notice that 2.6 also has one extra chunk that 2.4 does not
> > have :
> >
> > if (unlikely(need_revalidate)) {
> > + if (offset) {
> > offset = ext2_validate_entry(kaddr, offset, chunk_mask);
> > + filp->f_pos = (n<<PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) + offset;
> > + }
> > + filp->f_version = inode->i_version;
> > need_revalidate = 0;
> > }
> >
> > I have no idea whether this part is needed, we'd better ask Theo or Al
> > for some advices, as I'm not tempted by merging an uncertain patch when
> > it comes to filesystems.
>
> Looks like a test case may be available:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=2d7f2ea9c989853310c7f6e8be52cc090cc8e66b
Dann, would you care to ping Al about the opportunity to merge this entire
patch, as well as Masoud for his test-case ? The patch looks like all what
remains different between 2.4 and 2.6, so I would bet we need it too.
Thanks,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists