[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871w6z6ajs.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:45:43 +0100
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com>
To: "Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, adaplas@....net,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fbdev: Make deferred I/O work as advertized
"Jaya Kumar" <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1 2.6.24] fbdev: defio and Metronomefb
>> From: Jaya Kumar <jayakumar.lkml@...il.com>
>> Date: 2008-02-18 13:41:26
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Andrew pointed out that there may be race conditions associated with
> this patch. [ http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev-devel&m=120376473020396&w=2
> ] So I would not encourage anyone to merge it. I'll try to figure
> things out this weekend.
>
> Thanks,
> jaya
Thanks for the timely info. I'm not in an undue hurry to get this
merged. As long as we're moving forward, I'm happy.
What about pushing the fb_defio fixes independently of any new
fb_defio users? If fb_defio was worth merging into Linus's tree, it
should be worth fixing there, whether new users are in shape already
or not.
If we must have a new user, well, I could easily whip up something
like FB_VIRTUAL on top of fb_defio.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists