linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24.2-rt2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0802261155330.10116@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:55:58 -0500 (EST)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24.2-rt2



On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> >
> > What's the NUMA topology?
>
> 4 nodes. I'm not sure if it is really NUMA related, but the same kernel
> runs that test as expected on a non-NUMA 2x2 box.
>
> > What tasks are running, and at what priorities?
>
> 40 pthreads, created with default parameters from a main thread which
> runs with default parameters as well. The threads simply run endless loops.
>
> >
> > Those three idle CPUS, should they have tasks running on them?
>
> For sure, given the overload situation of the system (40x full load vs.
> 16 cores). Neither did we fiddle with any parameter of the system
> (knowingly, its a standard openSUSE 10.3 underneath) nor did we set
> thread affinities.
>

Do you get different behaviour with 2.6.24.2?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/