[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <47C321E9.BA47.005A.0@novell.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:15:37 -0700
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: "Sven Dietrich" <SDietrich@...ell.com>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>
Cc: <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...e.hu>, <bill.huey@...il.com>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <kevin@...man.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<cminyard@...sta.com>, <dsingleton@...sta.com>,
<dwalker@...sta.com>, "Moiz Kohari" <MKohari@...ell.com>,
"Peter Morreale" <PMorreale@...ell.com>, <dsaxena@...xity.net>,
<acme@...hat.com>, <ak@...e.de>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<npiggin@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [(RT RFC) PATCH v2 2/9] sysctl for runtime-control of
lateral mutex stealing
>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:57 PM, in message
<1203980231.16711.115.camel@...n.thebigcorporation.com>, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
<sdietrich@...ell.com> wrote:
>
> But Greg may need to enforce it on his git tree that he mails these from
> - are you referring to anything specific in this patch?
>
Thats what I don't get. I *did* checkpatch all of these before sending them out (and I have for every release).
I am aware of two "tabs vs spaces" warnings, but the rest checked clean. Why do some people still see errors when I don't? Is there a set of switches I should supply to checkpatch to make it more aggressive or something?
-Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists