[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080226123003.38c2282f@extreme>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:30:03 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
stephen.hemminger@...tta.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.24.3 (if_addrlabel.h HEADERS_CHECK failure)
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:01:37 -0800
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:29:43AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:38:47 +0000
> > Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > >> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.24.3
> > > >> kernel.
> > > >
> > > > When HEADERS_CHECK=y:
> > > >
> > > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24.3/include/linux/if_addrlabel.h', needed by `/local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24.3/usr/include/linux/if_addrlabel.h'. Stop.
> > > > make[2]: *** [linux] Error 2
> > >
> > > This appears to have been caused by the patch titled:
> > >
> > > NET: Add if_addrlabel.h to sanitized headers.
> > >
> > > The patch only adds the unifdef-y entry for this header file, however
> > > that header was only added after 2.6.24.
> > >
> > > It seems that this patch was submitted to -stable in error. Stephen, can
> > > you confirm?
> >
> > The patch was meant for 2.6.25 only.
>
> So should it be reverted? David sent it to me for some reason :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
yes. please revert it for next build.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists