lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:30:03 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	stephen.hemminger@...tta.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.24.3 (if_addrlabel.h HEADERS_CHECK failure)

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:01:37 -0800
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:29:43AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:38:47 +0000
> > Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > >> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.24.3
> > > >> kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > When HEADERS_CHECK=y:
> > > > 
> > > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24.3/include/linux/if_addrlabel.h', needed by `/local/linsrc/linux-2.6.24.3/usr/include/linux/if_addrlabel.h'.  Stop.
> > > > make[2]: *** [linux] Error 2
> > > 
> > > This appears to have been caused by the patch titled:
> > > 
> > > 	NET: Add if_addrlabel.h to sanitized headers.
> > > 
> > > The patch only adds the unifdef-y entry for this header file, however 
> > > that header was only added after 2.6.24.
> > > 
> > > It seems that this patch was submitted to -stable in error. Stephen, can 
> > > you confirm?
> > 
> > The patch was meant for 2.6.25 only. 
> 
> So should it be reverted?  David sent it to me for some reason :)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

yes. please revert it for next build.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ