linux-kernel - Re: [patch 6/6] mempolicy: update NUMA memory policy documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0802261322170.10790@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:23:43 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clameter@....com,
	Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, ak@...e.de, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] mempolicy: update NUMA memory policy documentation

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Paul Jackson wrote:

> Hmmm ... I've read this several times now ... still can't figure out
> what it's saying ;).  And it doesn't really explain key aspects of
> MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES, such as that it provides cpuset relative
> numbering (use nodes 0..N-1, regardless of your current cpuset, to
> refer to the first N nodes in whatever is your current cpuset.)
> 

I'll elaborate more on the MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES effect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/