linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.24.3 (if_addrlabel.h HEADERS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080226.141413.223249736.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:14:13 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	shemminger@...tta.com
Cc:	dsd@...too.org, randy.dunlap@...cle.com, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stephen.hemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24.3 (if_addrlabel.h HEADERS_CHECK failure)

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:29:43 -0800

> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:38:47 +0000
> Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org> wrote:
> 
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > This appears to have been caused by the patch titled:
> > 
> > 	NET: Add if_addrlabel.h to sanitized headers.
> > 
> > The patch only adds the unifdef-y entry for this header file, however 
> > that header was only added after 2.6.24.
> > 
> > It seems that this patch was submitted to -stable in error. Stephen, can 
> > you confirm?
> 
> The patch was meant for 2.6.25 only. 

My bad, please revert :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/