[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080225212056.ca388983.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:20:56 -0600
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clameter@....com,
Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum
David wrote:
+enum {
+ MPOL_DEFAULT,
+ MPOL_PREFERRED,
+ MPOL_BIND,
+ MPOL_INTERLEAVE,
+ MPOL_MAX, /* always last member of enum */
Aren't the values that these constants take part of the
user visible kernel API?
In other words, if someone added another MPOL_* in the middle
of this enum, it would break mbind/set_mempolicy/get_mempolicy
users, right:
+enum {
+ MPOL_DEFAULT,
+ MPOL_PREFERRED,
+ MPOL_YET_ANOTHER_FLAG, /* <== added flag ... oops */
+ MPOL_BIND,
+ MPOL_INTERLEAVE,
+ MPOL_MAX, /* always last member of enum */
I'm thinking that we should still specify the specific value
of each of these flags, by way of documenting these necessary
values, as in:
+enum {
+ MPOL_DEFAULT = 0,
+ MPOL_PREFERRED = 1,
+ MPOL_BIND = 2,
+ MPOL_INTERLEAVE = 3,
+ MPOL_MAX, /* always last member of enum */
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists