[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080225220242.82aedaec.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:02:42 -0600
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clameter@....com,
Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] mempolicy: convert MPOL constants to enum
David wrote:
> I don't suspect that a kernel developer is going
> to make such an egregious error.
Eh ... each bit of added clarity to the code reduces
errors.
Looking around the kernel, it really seems to me to be
a common coding to explicitly spell out enum values
when for some reason they actually matter.
Like most coding mechanisms, nothing guarantees anything.
It just nicely represents one particular detail, that
the values of these MPOL_* terms are not arbitrary.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists