[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080226051307.GC17772@kryten>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:13:07 -0600
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
To: Soeren Sandmann <sandmann@...mi.au.dk>
Cc: John Levon <levon@...ementarian.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...x.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add the debugfs interface for the sysprof tool
> It was only later I tried oprofile and found it not only much more
> difficult to use, but also much less useful when I did get it to work.
This surprises me. Can you please elaborate on why oprofile is "much
less useful" than sysprof?
Anton - who has used oprofile to analyse and tune databases, JVMs,
compilers and operating systems. Maybe I've been missing out on
the killer app for all this time!!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists