[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440802252127i36fcd164xe6671aada160766a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:27:42 -0800
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Ravikiran Thirumalai" <kiran@...lemp.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
shai@...lemp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: make amd quad core 8 socket system not be clustered_box v2
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lemp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:46:25AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> I don't quite understand the purpose of the patch to begin with. Looking at
> >> the current x86 git tree, apic_is_clustered_box is used only to determine if
> >> tsc is synchronized on the platform. The AMD docs imply that TSC's are not
> >> guaranteed to be synced across cores between nodes -- Opteron BKDG for
> >> family 10h, Section 2.9.4:
> >
> >After long discussions with AMD they determined the CPUID flag
> >for sync RDTSC will imply synchronization between nodes.
>
> Ah!
>
>
> >
> >If you can't support that in your hardware you're supposed
> >to clear it.
>
> Hmm! How would a hardware vendor do that? That doesn't seem to be clear in
> the BKDG. (Well, this is the problem with undocumented features :()
>
any good sign for APIC_clustered box? there is apicid between cpus
even all cpu are quadcore and fully populated?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists