linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: multiple updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:17:44 +0100
From:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>
To:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se, khc@...waw.pl, bhalevy.lists@...il.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: multiple updates

On Mit, 2008-02-27 at 11:02 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> 
> > On Mit, 2008-02-27 at 00:40 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +Continuation lines are always shorter than the initial one and are
> > > > +(1) indented as much as the initial line, plus (2) alignment spaces.
> > > > +Spaces are used so as to not cause odd aligning for users wishing to
> > > > +display tabs at sizes other than 8. In the example below, the
> > > > +continuation line of the printk call therefore has two tabs of logical
> > > > +indent, followed by a number of spaces to align it up.
> > > 
> > > Now, I think, I am not the only one using emacs. Until now the "linux" 
> > > C-style fitted perfectly with the CodingStyle, now it no longer will. 
> > > Namely, emacs puts as many tabs to indent the continuation line as fit 
> > > (i.e., at tab width = 8 spaces it's just (extra indent / 8) tabs plus 
> > > (extra indent % 8) spaces. Is there a way to make emacs behave compatibly 
> > > to this proposal? If not, I would not like to have to re-indent every such 
> > 
> > Unless I'm misunderstanding something completely: Add "indent-tabs-mode:
> > nil" in a "Local Variables:" section.
> > But since Linux-style has that since ages (if not ever), that should be
> > set for am emacs'ens linux-mode anyway.
> 
> I think you do misunderstand something. The "linux" emacs mode as I know 

Yes, I`m silly - -ENOCOFFEE;-) CodingStyle/"linux-mode" *does* use TABs
since ever.

> it does for the following example
> 
> 1:	function(arg1,
> 2:		 arg2);
> 
> in line 2 two TABs and one space. Whereas the proposal in discussion wants 
> to have there one TAB and nine spaces.

I stand corrected, you are right.

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/