[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200802271708.04766.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:04 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: sds@...ho.nsa.gov, jmorris@...ei.org, eparis@...isplace.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] selinux/netlabel.c should #include "netlabel.h"
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 4:55:43 pm Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 February 2008 4:20:42 pm Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Every file should include the headers containing the externs for
> > > its global code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> >
> > It doesn't _need_ the file in the strictest sense, the header file
> > is just there for the core SELinux code to call into the
> > NetLabel/SELinux glue code (what is in
> > security/selinux/netlabel.c). However, if this is to conform
> > better to kernel coding policy (I assume that is the case here?)
> > then that is fine with me.
>
> I'm not claiming it needs it.
>
> But with this #include gcc can check that the prototypes in
> netlabel.h match the functions in netlabel.c
>
> The bugs this catches are rare, but when you have such a bug it can
> be nasty to debug.
Good point, hadn't thought of that - thanks.
> > Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists