[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080227221033.GR17932@hjernemadsen.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:10:33 +0100
From: "Klaus S. Madsen" <ksm@...rnemadsen.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Regression in 2.6.25-rc3: s2ram segfaults before suspending
Hi all,
I have a Thinkpad T61p, which I'm able to suspend with s2ram on
Linux 2.6.24.3. However when I try to suspend it on 2.6.25-rc3, s2ram
dies after changing to vt1, with a segfault. I'm using s2ram from cvs,
and libx86 version 0.99 from http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/libx86/.
Some details about the segfault:
$ sudo gdb ./s2ram
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/ksm/downloads/suspend/s2ram
Switching from vt7 to vt1
Calling get_mode
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7facf4a in run_vm86 () at lrmi.c:526
526 asm volatile (
(gdb) list
521 static int
522 lrmi_vm86(struct vm86_struct *vm)
523 {
524 int r;
525 #ifdef __PIC__
526 asm volatile (
527 "pushl %%ebx\n\t"
528 "movl %2, %%ebx\n\t"
529 "int $0x80\n\t"
530 "popl %%ebx"
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7facf4a in run_vm86 () at lrmi.c:526
#1 0xb7fad61b in LRMI_int (i=16, r=0xbffca670) at lrmi.c:844
#2 0x0804acfc in do_vbe_service (AX=20227, BX=0, regs=0xbffca670)
at vbetool/vbetool.c:158
#3 0x0804af7e in __get_mode () at vbetool/vbetool.c:453
#4 0x0804a30f in s2ram_hacks () at s2ram-x86.c:268
#5 0x0804954f in main (argc=1, argv=0x0) at s2ram-main.c:92
I have tried to bisect the problem, and it fingered the following
commit:
commit 82bc03fc158e28c90d7ed9919410776039cb4e14
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
x86: add PWT to NOCACHE flags
Reverting this commit in the bisected tree (by executing git show
82bc03fc158e28c90d7ed9919410776039cb4e14 | patch -R -p1), makes the
segfault go away. I've run make clean between each kernel compile, to be
sure the tree was correctly compiled.
I have attached the .config I'm using for 2.6.25-rc3 (when bisecting, I
just choose the default on every question). If necessary, I can try to
reconstruct the one I ended up with after the bisection.
Hope this makes sense to someone, and thanks in advance.
--
Kind regards
Klaus S. Madsen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists