[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080227131939.4244.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:26:47 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2
Hi Peter,
> > +
> > + atomic_t nr_reclaimers;
> > + wait_queue_head_t reclaim_throttle_waitq;
> > /*
> > * rarely used fields:
> > */
>
> Small nit, that extra blank line seems at the wrong end of the text
> block :-)
Agghhh, sorry ;-)
I'll fix at next post.
> > +out:
> > + atomic_dec(&zone->nr_reclaimers);
> > + wake_up_all(&zone->reclaim_throttle_waitq);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> Would it be possible - and worthwhile - to make this FIFO fair?
Hmmm
may be, we don't need perfectly fair.
because try_to_free_page() is unfair mechanism.
but I will test use wake_up() instead wake_up_all().
it makes so so fair order if no performance regression happend.
Thanks very useful comment.
- kosaki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists