[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080227143301.4252.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:33:57 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] page reclaim throttle take2
Hi David,
> I disagree, the config option is indeed static but so is the NUMA topology
> of the machine. It represents the maximum number of page reclaim threads
> that should be allowed for that specific topology; a maximum should not
> need to be redefined with yet another sysctl and should remain independent
> of various workloads.
ok.
> However, I would recommend adding the word "MAX" to the config option.
MAX_PARALLEL_RECLAIM_TASK is good word?
- kosaki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists