linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/12] Generic semaphore implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:18:23 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] Generic semaphore implementation


* Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:

> Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C 
> implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and 
> extensibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>

very nice work!

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/