[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47C66839.7080607@qumranet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:52:25 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] anon-inodes: Remove fd_install() from anon_inode_getfd()
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs-2.6.git;a=commit;h=49be4f8114e6ff0efdab10ebba2493fb67bc3034
>
> Actually, looking closer at the kvm changes here, I think that
> create_vcpu_fd() needs the same treatment as kvm_dev_ioctl_create_vm()
> gets in the patch because of the race I mentioned in the changelog
> for my patch: otherwise kvm_vcpu_release() could drop the last
> reference to vcpu->kvm->filp before the get_file() gets an extra
> reference.
>
> I'm beginning to think that moving the fd_install() out of
> anon_inode_getfd() really is worth it to make a safer interface.
>
It makes is less usable, though (since the last step needs to be taken
by the caller.
We might add a int (*prepare_file)(...) parameter which
anon_inode_getfd() uses to munge the file before installing it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists