linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080228020808.3fd22f77.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:08:08 -0600
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...sign.ru,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, maxk@...lcomm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation

Ingo wrote:
> nice work Peter

agreed

> i've queued up your patches in sched-devel.git

Before this patchset gets too far, I'd like to decide on whether to
adapt my suggestion to call that per-cpuset flag 'cpus_system' (or
anything else with 'cpu' in it, perhaps 'system_cpus' would be more
idiomatic), rather than the tad too generic 'system'.

People doing 'ls /dev/cpuset' should be able to half-way guess
what things do, just from their name.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/