[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080228081412.GE28781@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:14:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc2
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > incrementing the variable with a "++" when interrupts are not
> > > disabled. It's not an atomic add and it's racy. The code within
> > > stat() does exactly this.
> >
> > Yes but that is only for used for statistics which can be racy. Note
> > that the VM event statistics also can be racy.
>
> Doing ++ on a u32 _is_ atomic wrt interrupts on x86 and probably lots
> of other architectures, so we're OK using unsigned there. [...]
hm, why should it be atomic wrt. irqs? There's nothing that keeps gcc
from not doing an "incl memory_address" but do something like: "load
memory address into regx, incl regx, ... store address into memory
address" - and that's not atomic at that point.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists