[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1204194361.6243.31.camel@lappy>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:26:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx@...utronix.de, oleg@...sign.ru, rostedt@...dmis.org,
maxk@...lcomm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 02:12 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > Should the kernel refuse to move some threads, such as the migration
> > or watchdog kthreads, out of the root cpuset where the mems can be
> > adjusted to disallow access to the cpu to which they are bound? This is
> > a quick way to cause a crash or soft lockup.
Indeed, there is a hole in my cpus_match_system() logic in that when the
system set is reduced to a single cpu, the tasks bound to that cpu also
match.
I had wanted to avoid adding PF_ flags (as I remember we're running
short on them), but I think you're right.
Thanks!
> Something like this?
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
> kernel/cpuset.c | 5 ++++-
> kernel/kthread.c | 1 +
> kernel/sched.c | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1464,6 +1464,7 @@ static inline void put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t)
> #define PF_SWAPWRITE 0x00800000 /* Allowed to write to swap */
> #define PF_SPREAD_PAGE 0x01000000 /* Spread page cache over cpuset */
> #define PF_SPREAD_SLAB 0x02000000 /* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
> +#define PF_CPU_BOUND 0x04000000 /* Kthread bound to specific cpu */
> #define PF_MEMPOLICY 0x10000000 /* Non-default NUMA mempolicy */
> #define PF_MUTEX_TESTER 0x20000000 /* Thread belongs to the rt mutex tester */
> #define PF_FREEZER_SKIP 0x40000000 /* Freezer should not count it as freezeable */
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -1175,11 +1175,14 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> struct cpuset *cs = cgroup_cs(cont);
> struct cpuset *oldcs = cgroup_cs(oldcont);
> + int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
> guarantee_online_cpus(cs, &cpus);
> - set_cpus_allowed(tsk, cpus);
> + ret = set_cpus_allowed(tsk, cpus);
> mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return;
>
> from = oldcs->mems_allowed;
> to = cs->mems_allowed;
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu)
> wait_task_inactive(k);
> set_task_cpu(k, cpu);
> k->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
> + k->flags |= PF_CPU_BOUND;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_bind);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -5345,6 +5345,12 @@ int set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, cpumask_t new_mask)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (unlikely((p->flags & PF_CPU_BOUND) && p != current &&
> + !cpus_equal(p->cpus_allowed, new_mask))) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> if (p->sched_class->set_cpus_allowed)
> p->sched_class->set_cpus_allowed(p, &new_mask);
> else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists