[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0802280708r26fc88ch5a488eb8bc1227c5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:08:56 +0100
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: 7eggert@....de, "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
"Pierre Habouzit" <madcoder@...ian.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
"Marc Lehmann" <schmorp@...morp.de>,
"David Schwartz" <davids@...master.com>
Subject: Re: epoll and shared fd's
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:16:30 +0100, Bodo Eggert said:
> > Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > file handle have been closed. This means that
> > > even after a file descriptor that is part of an
> > > epoll set has been closed, events may be reported
> > > for that file descriptor if other file descriptors
> > > referring to the same underlying file description
> > > remain open.
>
> Is it worth making special mention of the case where a process gets events
> for a FD that it has closed, because a parent or child process still has
> an inherited copy of the FD still open?
I'm not sure -- perhaps under a BUGS section? Did you read my reply
about this point in the thread "Re: epoll design problems with common
fork/exec patterns"?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Maintainer of the Linux man-pages project
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Want to report a man-pages bug? Look here:
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists