| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5d75f4610802280951h30f65f35p1432a29a86d14d5b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:51:01 +0700
From: "BuraphaLinux Server" <buraphalinuxserver@...il.com>
To: serge@...lyn.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: at program breaks with kernel 2.6.24
Since you asked, for the record I am the maintainer of
http://www.buraphalinux.org/download/bls1.1/ which is a small-time
compiled-from-source distribution (except java and ant). It is used
at the university where I teach, and for some government sites in
Bangkok. My distribution uses vanilla kernels, vanilla gcc, vanilla
libc, etc. I apply patches for path differences, CVEs, and for trying
to get old stuff to build with newer gcc, but otherwise I don't patch
things. Of the known distributions, we are most similar to Slackware.
I did try everything I knew before bothering the list with this. I
am testing a beta of my next release that is the first with
capabilites enabled, and hit this problem with 'at' after updating a
test machine from 2.6.23.16 to the 2.6.24.2 kernel.
I will test the new version of the patch when I see it on the list and
report back what happens.
Thank you for your help.
On 2/29/08, serge@...lyn.com <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
> Quoting BuraphaLinux Server (buraphalinuxserver@...il.com):
> > Thank you for the patch to try. This patch works perfectly. Is it
> > safe to apply this to 2.6.24.3?
>
> I took care not to touch commoncap.c so that it should hopefully apply
> cleanly to the past few kernels.
>
> > I hope it is in 2.6.24.4
>
> I'm getting ready to send out a more complete version of the patch.
>
> thanks,
> -serge
>
> > On 2/28/08, serge@...lyn.com <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
> > > Quoting BuraphaLinux Server (buraphalinuxserver@...il.com):
> > > > This is gmail which has broken line wrapping I cannot fix. Anyway, I
> > > > did build the new kernel but it still does not work for me. I tried to
> > > > strace, but that didn't work for me either. This is as a non-root user
> > > > (and same 'at'/'atd' binaries work on 2.6.23.X):
> > > >
> > > > bash-3.2$ at now
> > > > warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
> > > > at> echo "suid is busted"
> > > > at> <EOT>
> > > > job 4 at Thu Feb 28 02:16:00 2008
> > > > Can't signal atd (permission denied)
> > > > bash-3.2$ ls -ld $(which at)
> > > > -rws--x--x 1 daemon daemon 36468 Jan 11 15:37 /usr/bin/at
> > > > bash-3.2$ ps -ef | grep atd
> > > > daemon 2874 1 0 02:14 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/atd -b 15 -l 1
> > > > bozo 3054 3049 0 02:16 pts/0 00:00:00 grep atd
> > > > bash-3.2$ ls -ld /var/spool/at*
> > > > drwxrwxrwt 2 daemon daemon 4096 Feb 28 02:16 /var/spool/atjobs
> > > > drwx------ 2 daemon daemon 4096 Feb 27 20:02 /var/spool/atspool
> > > > bash-3.2$ uname -a
> > > > Linux zappaman.cs.buu.ac.th 2.6.25-rc3 #1 SMP Thu Feb 28 01:29:46 ICT
> > > > 2008 i686 pentium4 i386 GNU/Linux
> > > > bash-3.2$ strace -s 99999 -v -o /tmp/pain at now
> > > > warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
> > > > Cannot open lockfile /var/spool/atjobs/.SEQ: Permission denied
> > > > bash-3.2$ at now
> > > > warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
> > > > at> echo "hi"
> > > > at> <EOT>
> > > > job 7 at Thu Feb 28 02:19:00 2008
> > > > Can't signal atd (permission denied)
> > > >
> > > > My kenrel .config is big, so it is attached so I don't get any cut and
> > > > paste error.
> > > >
> > > > On 2/28/08, serge@...lyn.com <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
> > > > > Quoting BuraphaLinux Server (buraphalinuxserver@...il.com):
> > > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=463669
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have the same problem - it is not debian specific. Did the
> > > > > > semantics of kill() change with the new kernel? I thought as long
> as
> > > > > > something is setuid, even with capability stuff around the setuid
> > > > > > programs just get _all_ capabilities and would keep working.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I did a good search and found many people with the problem, but no
> > > > > > solutions except going back to 2.6.23.x kernels. I guess you'll
> flame
> > > > > > me, but at least include a link to the solution too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why would we flame you?
> > > >
> > > > Because maybe I'm doing something stupid and didn't patch/rebuild
> > > > something when changing kernels like I should. I haven't had trouble
> > > > with at for many years of kernel changes, but 2.6.24 was the first
> > > > with the new security stuff and maybe I need to have some
> > > > capability-aware 'at' program?
> > > >
> > > > > I'll just apologize as I
> think
> > > it's my fault,
> > > > > and ask you to please try the newest available kernel where I
> believe it
> > > > > should be fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Do I need to recompile glibc and the at software to adjust so some
> > > > kernel interface changes? Did the 'make oldconfig' generate some bad
> > > > config combination? As root it works, so I don't think the at or atd
> > > > are broken (but maybe they have to be patched for >2.6.23.X ?)
> > > >
> > > > bash-3.2$ su - root
> > > > Password:
> > > > BLS #at now
> > > > warning: commands will be executed using /bin/sh
> > > > at> echo "uh-huh..."
> > > > at> <EOT>
> > > > job 8 at Thu Feb 28 02:30:00 2008
> > > >
> > > > (and I checked and the job completes normally)
> > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > -serge
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for reading. Any ideas on what to try next?
> > >
> > > I'm working on setting up something I can test this on better, but just
> > > for good measure can you try the following patch? It should simply
> > > prevent the extra signal checks from happening.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > -serge
> > >
> > > From f48d28fe525652cb7321d5f545f9dcdfb3ce97d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:53:47 +0000
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] file capabilities: get rid of cap_task_kill
> > >
> > > This is just a test to not use cap_task_kill. We will see whether
> > > this fixes the atd problem
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/security.h | 2 +-
> > > security/capability.c | 1 -
> > > 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> > > index fe52cde..4c43914 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/security.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> > > @@ -2138,7 +2138,7 @@ static inline int security_task_kill (struct
> > > task_struct *p,
> > > struct siginfo *info, int sig,
> > > u32 secid)
> > > {
> > > - return cap_task_kill(p, info, sig, secid);
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline int security_task_wait (struct task_struct *p)
> > > diff --git a/security/capability.c b/security/capability.c
> > > index 9e99f36..2c6e06d 100644
> > > --- a/security/capability.c
> > > +++ b/security/capability.c
> > > @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ static struct security_operations capability_ops = {
> > > .inode_need_killpriv = cap_inode_need_killpriv,
> > > .inode_killpriv = cap_inode_killpriv,
> > >
> > > - .task_kill = cap_task_kill,
> > > .task_setscheduler = cap_task_setscheduler,
> > > .task_setioprio = cap_task_setioprio,
> > > .task_setnice = cap_task_setnice,
> > > --
> > > 1.5.2.5
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists