linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] sched: remove isolcpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47C70D49.2060909@qualcomm.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:36:41 -0800
From:	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] sched: remove isolcpus

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:57 -0800, Max Krasnyanskiy wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> cpu isolation doesn't offer anything over cpusets, hence remove it.
>> Works for me. That's what I suggested in my reply to your comments.
>> Here is the quote from the previous thread:
> 
> Dude, I've been pushing a cpuset interface from the get go.
Right. And you ended up with exact same solution for the map that represents
the CPUs that are isolated (or not isolated).
I was just saying that I was asking people how to integrate cpu_isolated_map
with cpusets, none of you guys acked or nacked it.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/