[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1tzjs4yn6.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:25:01 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: serge@...lyn.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH 1/1] file capabilities: simplify signal check
serge@...lyn.com writes:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@...ssion.com):
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>>
>> > um, is that code namespace-clean?
>>
>> Choke, gag.
>
> Oh, sorry, I got lost in the set of patches in the message. To be
> clear, my little 4-patch uid-ns-signal patchset can simply be updated
> to make the cap_task_kill() uid check into if (task_user_equiv(current, p)
>
> But Eric if you simply drop cap_task_kill() (don't make it return 0,
> just drop the function and go back to not setting task_kill in the
> capability_security_ops) I'll ack that. Else I'll write the patch
> thursday. At this point the only thing that will be denied by
> cap_task_kill() but not by check_kill_permission() is funky euid cases.
> That's wrong. (cc'ing amorgan in the event I'm forgetting something
> useful the fn is doing)
Go ahead. I'm fighting a cold and am fairly overloaded at the moment.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists